An international group representing leading endocrinology associations has recommended that the name "diabetes insipidus" — which in some cases has led to harm — be changed to eliminate confusion with "diabetes mellitus" and to reflect the former condition's pathophysiology.
The new proposed names are arginine vasopressin deficiency (AVP-D) for central (also called "cranial") etiologies and arginine vasopressin resistance (AVP-R) for nephrogenic (kidney) etiologies.
"What we're proposing is to rename the disease according to the pathophysiology that defines it," statement co-author Joseph G. Verbalis, MD, professor of medicine and chief of endocrinology and metabolism at Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC, told Medscape Medical News.
The statement advises that henceforth the new names be used in manuscripts and the medical literaturewhile keeping the old names in parentheses during a transition period, as in "AVP-deficiency (cranial diabetes insipidus)" and "AVP-resistance (nephrogenic diabetes insipidus)."
The condition formerly known as diabetes insipidus is relatively rare, occurring in about 1 person per 10-15,000 population. It is caused by either deficient production or resistance in the kidney to the hormone AVP, normally produced by the hypothalamus and stored in the pituitary gland. AVP, also called antidiuretic hormone, regulates the body's water level and urine production by the kidney.
Both etiologies lead to extreme thirst and excessive production of urine. Common causes of the deficiency include head trauma or brain tumor, while resistance in the kidney is often congenital. It is currently treated with a synthetic form of AVP called desmopressin and fluid replacement.
What's in a Name?
Theproposal to change the namebythe Working Group for Renaming Diabetes Insipidusis endorsed by The Endocrine Society, European Society of Endocrinology, Pituitary Society, Society for Endocrinology, European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology, Endocrine Society of Australia, Brazilian Endocrine Society, and Japanese Endocrine Societyand under review by several other societies. It was published as a position statement in several of those society's journals, with more to follow.
Historically, the word "diabetes", a Greek word meaning "siphon", was used in the 1st and 2nd century BC to describe excess flow of urine. The Latin word "mellitus" or "honey" was added in the late 17th century to describe the sweetness of the urine in the dysglycemic condition.
A century later, the Latin word "insipidus", meaning insipid or tasteless, was coined to distinguish between the two types of polyuria, the position statement details.
In the late 19th to early 20th century, the vasopressor and antidiuretic actions of posterior pituitary extracts were discovered and used to treat people with both the central and nephrogenic etiologies, which were also recognized around that time, yet, the name "diabetes insipidus" has persisted.
"From a historical perspective, the name is perfectly appropriate. At the time it was identified, and it was realized that it was different from diabetes mellitus, that was a perfectly appropriate terminology based on what was known in the late 19th century — butnot now. It has persisted through the years simply because in medicine there's a lot of inertia for change...It's just always been called that. If there's not a compelling reason to change a name, generally there's no move to change it," Verbalis observed.
"Dramatic Cases of Patient Mismanagement" Due to Name Confusion
Unfortunately, the urgency for the change arose from tragedy. In 2009, a 22-year-old man was admitted to the orthopedics department of a London teaching hospital for a hip replacement. Despite his known panhypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus, the nurses continually checked his blood glucose but didn't give him desmopressin or sufficient fluids. Laboratory testing showed normal glucosebut his serum sodium was 149mmol/L. The morning after his operation, he had a fatal cardiac arrest with a serum sodium of 169mmol/L.
"The nurses thought he had diabetes mellitus...Sothat was death due to failure to recognize that diabetes insipidus is not diabetes mellitus," Verbalis said. "If he had been admitted to endocrinology this wouldn't have happened. But he was admitted to orthopedics. Non-endocrinologists are not so aware of diabetes insipidus because it is a rare disease."
In 2016, National Health Service England issued a patient safety alert about the "risk of severe harm or death when desmopressin is omitted or delayed in patients with cranial diabetes insipidus," citing at least four incidents within the prior 7 years where omission of desmopressin had resulted in severe dehydration and death, with another 76 casesof omission or delay that were acted on before the patients became critically ill.
Further impetus for the name change came from the results of an anonymous web-based survey of 1034 adult and pediatric patients with central diabetes insipidusconducted between August 2021 and February 2022. Overall, 80% reported encountering situations in which their condition had been confused with diabetes mellitus by healthcare professionals, and 85% supported renaming the disease.
There was some divergence in opinion as to what the new name(s) should be, but clear agreement that the term "diabetes" should not be part of it.
"We've only become recently aware that there are dramatic cases of patient mismanagement due to the confusion caused by the word 'diabetes'. We think patients should have a voice. If a legitimate patient survey says over 80% think this name should be changed, then I think we as endocrinologists need to pay attention to that," Verbalis said.
But while endocrinologists are the ones who see these patients the most often, Verbalis said a main aim of the position statement "is really to change the mindset of non-endocrinologist doctors and nurses and other healthcare professionals that this is not diabetes mellitus. It's a totally different disease. And if we give it a totally different name, then I think they will better recognize that."
As to how long Verbalis thinks it will take for the new names to catch on, he pointed out that it's taken about a decade for the rheumatology field to fully adopt the name "granulomatosis with polyangiitis" as a replacement for "Wegener's granulomatosis" after the eponymous physician's Nazi ties were revealed.
"So we're not anticipating that this is going to change terminology tomorrow. It's a long process. We just wanted to get the process started," he said.
Verbalis has reported consulting for Otsuka.
Eur J Endocrinol. Published online October 14, 2022. Full text
Miriam E. Tucker is a freelance journalist based in the Washington, DC, area. She is a regular contributor to Medscape, with other work appearing in The Washington Post, NPR's Shots blog, and Diabetes Forecast magazine. She is on Twitter: @MiriamETucker.
For more news, follow Medscape onFacebook,Twitter,Instagram,YouTube, andLinkedIn.